CALL ME (24/7) 778-760-4233

The Queen v. W. (C.) 2018 (Provincial Court of Alberta)

Client was the passenger in a car that was pulled over for speeding. After smelling marihuana the officer called for back up. The client and the driver were arrested and two firearms were found, a sawn off shotgun and a loaded pistol. The client was charged with numerous firearm offences and faced serious jail time. On the morning of the preliminary inquiry, Mr. van der Walle spoke to the Crown and pointed out the severe evidentiary problems with the case and why the case may not even pass “the Shepherd test”, meaning that the case would not go on to trial. To his credit he agreed and ended the prosecution by entering a stay of proceedings.


Related Stories

The Queen v. S.(T.) 2018

  A police officer observed a car take a number of seconds to begin moving forward after a stop light turned green.  He followed the vehicle for a short distance and decided to pull it over to check the driver's sobriety.  The vehicle failed to pull over for almost...

read more

The Queen v. S.(D.) 2018

  A woman went to the police and told them that her boyfriend of 18 years had routinely forced her to have sex with him against her will.  Predictably, the client was indicted for sexual assault.  After electing trial by judge and jury and requesting a preliminary...

read more

The Queen v. M.(A.) 2018

  The police pulled a vehicle over as it left a local bar.  After the vehicle stopped the driver, the driver looked back at the police officer and then sped away from the traffic stop.  The police followed the vehicle at high speed.  On a long turn the vehicle left...

read more


Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.