CALL ME (24/7) 778-760-4233

  After an investigation into a number of arsons, the police obtained a search warrant for the client’s house.  When conducting the search the police found two firearms that were allegedly stored contrary to regulations and in a careless manner.  The client was charged accordingly.  Prior to trial, Mr. van der Walle filed his Notice of Constitutional Argument, alleging that the search warrant was invalid because the police had not provided the issuing Justice  of the Peace with sufficient information to amount to reasonable grounds, or “probable cause” as the Americans like to say, that evidence of the offences would be found inside the client’s home.  The Crown counsel wisely decided that the defence argument had serious merit and much to his credit decided to “drop” the charges by entering a stay of proceedings on the first morning of trial.  Not guilty.  No trial necessary.


Related Stories

The Queen v. E.(C.) 2019

  The client was pulled over in the early morning hours in Kelowna .  The police observed an open can of beer in the centre console and detected an odour of alcohol on the client’s breath.  A roadside breath demand was made and the client blew a fail.  After that...

read more

The Queen v. D.(D.) 2019

  The client was pulled over just outside of Hinton, Alberta driving a rental SUV.  Upon approaching the window, the officer smelled what he referred to as "fresh marihuana" and arrested the client on that basis.  A search of the interior of the vehicle revealed...

read more

The Queen v. B.(C.) 2019

  The client was charged with sexual assault on a person under the age of 16 after the neighbor girl reported that the client had briefly touched her private areas over her clothing.  The client was 80 years old at the time, was highly intoxicated at the time of...

read more


Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.