CALL ME (24/7) 778-760-4233

  After an investigation into a number of arsons, the police obtained a search warrant for the client’s house.  When conducting the search the police found two firearms that were allegedly stored contrary to regulations and in a careless manner.  The client was charged accordingly.  Prior to trial, Mr. van der Walle filed his Notice of Constitutional Argument, alleging that the search warrant was invalid because the police had not provided the issuing Justice  of the Peace with sufficient information to amount to reasonable grounds, or “probable cause” as the Americans like to say, that evidence of the offences would be found inside the client’s home.  The Crown counsel wisely decided that the defence argument had serious merit and much to his credit decided to “drop” the charges by entering a stay of proceedings on the first morning of trial.  Not guilty.  No trial necessary.


Related Stories

The Queen v. B.(R.) 2021 (Hinton, Alberta)

    The client was pulled over travelling through Jasper Alberta for having illegal window tints on his vehicle.  When the officer began writing the ticket he noticed that the client had been the subject of numerous drug trafficking investigations in the past. ...

read more

The Queen v. F.(W.) 2020 #2

  The client was pulled over leaving a bar in Revelstoke after a cab driver tipped off police that the client may be impaired driving.  The client blew a fail into a roadside device and was taken to the police station to provide samples.  At the police station he...

read more

The Queen v. B.(H.) 2020

  The police responded to a single vehicle accident in the middle of a sunny clear day on a straight stretch of road.  The client was found near the vehicle and when the officer spoke to him he noted that the client reeked of alcohol and had some slurred speech. ...

read more


Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.