The Queen v. B.(N.) 2013
Client charged with possession of cocaine for the purposes of trafficking. Police found cocaine in a car driven by the accused after he was arrested on unrelated charges. 60 days before the trial Mr. van der Walle filed his Notice of Constitutional Argument with the court. After reading the Notice the prosecutor agrees with Mr. van der Walle that the accused’s rights were violated during the search. Charges dropped before trial.
Related Stories
The King v. W.(A.) 2024
The client agreed to loan woman whom he had previously had sexual relations with a $100 loan to help her make rent for the month at her apartment in Penticton BC. The woman flirted with the client prior to his arrival at her apartment to give her the money by sending...
The King v. L.(K.) 2024
The client was pulled over by police after being observed weaving late at night on the highway near Kelowna BC. The officer smelled alcohol and had the client blow into a roadside device. The device registered a “fail” reading and the client was arrested and taken...
The King v. S.(M.) 2024
The client was driving down a residential street in Kelowna when she collided with a parked car. The police came to the scene and noted symptoms of impairment. They detained the client for impaired driving and made a breath demand on her. She ended up blowing well...