The Queen v. R.(S.) 2017
The client was initially charged with approximately 45 firearm offences, including possession of stolen firearms, after the police executed a search warrant at the client’s home. At the preliminary inquiry Mr. van der Walle successfully argued that the client should not be committed to stand trial on the most serious of the charges. As a result, the client went ahead to trial on about a dozen remaining charges alleging various firearm offences. After a lengthy voir dire (a trial within a trial to determine the admissibility of evidence) the trial judge agreed with Mr. van der Walle that his client’s rights had been violated in many ways during the execution of the search warrant. As a result, the judge ruled that all of the evidence found during the search was inadmissible in the trial because of the constitutional violations committed by the police. The client was acquitted of all charges and did not have to testify. In the end, the Crown had charged Mr. van der Walle’s client with over 40 charges and were not able to get a conviction on even a single count. Copies of the trial judge’s rulings can be viewed here: https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2016/2016bcsc2474/2016bcsc2474.html?autocompleteStr=robertson%202016%20bcsc&autocompletePos=3 and here: https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2017/2017bcsc965/2017bcsc965.html?autocompleteStr=robertson%202017%20bcsc&autocompletePos=1
<div class="et_social_inline et_social_mobile_on"><div class="et_social_networks et_social_6col et_social_slide et_social_rectangle et_social_top et_social_no_animation et_social_nospace et_social_outer_dark"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <ul class="et_social_icons_container"><li class="et_social_facebook"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F&t=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="facebook" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_facebook"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_twitter"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="http://twitter.com/share?text=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29&url=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="twitter" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_twitter"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_googleplus"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="https://plus.google.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F&t=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="googleplus" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_googleplus"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_gmail"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?view=cm&fs=1&su=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29&body=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F&ui=2&tf=1" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="gmail" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_gmail"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_linkedin"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F&title=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="linkedin" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_linkedin"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_all_button"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="#" rel="nofollow" data-location="inline" data-page_id="10569" data-permalink="http://criminallawyerkelownabc.com/2017/10/24/queen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta/" data-title="The Queen v. O. (T.) 2017 (Provincial Court of Alberta)" class="et_social_open_all"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_all_button"></i><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li></ul><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </div></div><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] -->
Related Stories
The King v. C.(R.) 2024
The police began investigating the client after a woman reported to them that two men had come to the door looking for her son. The woman explained that the men had told her son that he owed money from a drug debt and that he would be hurt if he did not pay. When...
The King v. T.(R.) 2024
Police were conducting a surveillance operation on the client and many other members of a suspected drug trafficking group in Vernon, Armstrong, and Enderby. The client was well known to police as he had a lengthy criminal record including no less than 7 prior...
The King v. S.(M.) 2024
A semi truck driver was cruising on the highway just outside of Revelstoke when another vehicle pulled out to pass him on a double solid line. While executing the pass, the other vehicle ended up clipping the semi as it tried to pull back into its lane which resulted...